 |
   | Title  | Article Title  | Journal Title  | Author  | Volume  | Issue  | Page Number(s)  | Year  | Subject Heading 1  | Abstract | Notes | AdminDate  |
|---|
| | A comparison of the population diagnosed with chlamydia in primary care with that diagnosed in sexual health clinics: implications for a national screening programme | Public Health | Cassell, J.A. et al | 120 | 10 | 984- | 2006 | Sexual Health | OBJECTIVES: To compare demographic, behavioural and HIV testing characteristics of individuals diagnosed with chlamydia infection in primary care with those in genitourinary medicine clinics, in the absence of a screening programme. The aim was to explore the current and potential contribution of primary care to the control of chlamydia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analysed data on individuals who reported one or more chlamydia diagnoses in the past 5 years in a large probability sample survey of the resident, UK general population aged 16-44 years. Estimates were weighted and odds ratios calculated. RESULTS: Women diagnosed in primary care reported fewer sexual partners, and were less likely to have had an HIV test in the past 5 years than their counterparts diagnosed in genitourinary medicine clinics. Age, ethnicity, social class, educational attainment and urbanization of area of residence did not differ between the two groups. Too few men were diagnosed in primary care to allow for such a comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care already diagnoses a large number of women with chlamydia infection, who may perceive themselves as low risk through age or sexual behaviour, yet are likely to comprise a substantial proportion of all infections. Few men are diagnosed in primary care. These groups need to be strategically targeted in the context of a future chlamydia screening programme, which will focus on the screening of younger women at high risk, and in which the role of primary care is still in development.
| Test for CAb compatibility with shareweb! | | | | How can users be involved in service improvement in health and social care, and why is this important? | Journal of Integrated Care Pathways | Challans, E. | 10 | 2 | 49- | 2006 | Advocacy | Unavailable | Test for compatibility with extrapoint! | | | | Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cuase of death inpatients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. | Lancet | Gandhi, N.R. et al | 368 | 9547 | 1575- | 2006 | Communicable Diseases | BACKGROUND: The epidemics of HIV-1 and tuberculosis in South Africa are closely related. High mortality rates in co-infected patients have improved with antiretroviral therapy, but drug-resistant tuberculosis has emerged as a major cause of death. We assessed the prevalence and consequences of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis in a rural area in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. METHODS: We undertook enhanced surveillance for drug-resistant tuberculosis with sputum culture and drug susceptibility testing in patients with known or suspected tuberculosis. Genotyping was done for isolates resistant to first-line and second-line drugs. RESULTS: From January, 2005, to March, 2006, sputum was obtained from 1539 patients. We detected MDR tuberculosis in 221 patients, of whom 53 had XDR tuberculosis. Prevalence among 475 patients with culture-confirmed tuberculosis was 39% (185 patients) for MDR and 6% (30) for XDR tuberculosis. Only 55% (26 of 47) of patients with XDR tuberculosis had never been previously treated for tuberculosis; 67% (28 of 42) had a recent hospital admission. All 44 patients with XDR tuberculosis who were tested for HIV were co-infected. 52 of 53 patients with XDR tuberculosis died, with median survival of 16 days from time of diagnosis (IQR 6-37) among the 42 patients with confirmed dates of death. Genotyping of isolates showed that 39 of 46 (85%, 95% CI 74-95) patients with XDR tuberculosis had similar strains. CONCLUSIONS: MDR tuberculosis is more prevalent than previously realised in this setting. XDR tuberculosis has been transmitted to HIV co-infected patients and is associated with high mortality. These observations warrant urgent intervention and threaten the success of treatment programmes for tuberculosis and HIV.
| Test for extrapoint! | |
|
|
|
|